Nine partners, twenty million small companies, and one question: how does a business model actually get changed in a company that has no research department to do it?

Horizon 2020, grant agreement No 645791 · reference archive, last revised August 2026

Empowering SME business model innovation

ENVISION set out to activate small businesses to innovate their business models. In the economic climate the project was written for, business model innovation was one of the few levers that could accelerate revenue growth in small European companies without asking them to invent new technology first.

Nine partners and their European-wide networks worked on the problem, with a reach of twenty million SMEs across the Union. The work was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 645791, and its main product is the Businessmakeover platform at businessmakeover.eu.

The challenge the call set

The Horizon 2020 call ENVISION answered, INSO-2-2014, put it plainly. Technologies as such do not have a specific value; their value is determined by the business models used to bring them to market. The return on Europe's investment in technology therefore depends not only on the framework conditions for innovation, but on effective business models — and many European enterprises, large or small, lack both the awareness and the tools to innovate theirs.

Business model innovation has been recognised in academic work for a long time as a key to competitiveness. It had not reached SMEs, and there was little knowledge of how small companies go about it in practice. By leveraging existing networks and communities, ENVISION gathered examples, best practices and insights from case studies in every European region and industry, complemented by insights from leading countries elsewhere. That library of patterns and managerial structures sits behind the platform, alongside tooling that makes it easier for a small company to develop, evaluate and plan a new business model.

The Businessmakeover platform built by the ENVISION consortium
Businessmakeover, the self-service platform the project was built around.
Programme
Horizon 2020, call INSO-2-2014
Grant agreement
No 645791
Coordinator
Delft University of Technology
Consortium
Nine partners across seven countries
Target reach
Three million SMEs, 15% of the European total
Platform
businessmakeover.eu
The ENVISION toolkit banner

The toolkit

It was deliberately assembled from things that already worked rather than built as one proprietary product. Five of them carried most of the weight.

  • Canvanizer

    The most used online canvas creator. A wide choice of canvases to brainstorm on, define a strategy with, or build a business model in, and co-workers can collaborate inside the platform itself.

  • TUZZit

    A collaborative whiteboard with a free tier and pro packages. Layering lets a team add post-its, checklists, images, links and stickers to a chosen canvas; the pro version is aimed at incubators, coaches and education institutions that want their own branding.

  • GroupMap

    Built for group decisions rather than for one author. Several people work on the same map, add notes and chat — and then vote, which ranks the team's ideas instead of leaving them in a flat list.

  • 100% Open Toolkit

    An open innovation resource hub. You identify the need first — say, building a business plan — then browse the tools that fit it, each with a short explanation and a worked example.

  • DIY Toolkit

    Development Impact & You: practical tools for social innovation, reached through a selection tree that works out what you are actually after, with clear instructions for each one.

A shared canvas in TUZZit
A shared canvas in TUZZit, mid-session.

Business model patterns

Alongside the tools, the project collected patterns — the recurring shapes a business model can take — each paired with a company that made it work.

  • Add-on · Ryanair
  • Affiliation · Amazon
  • Auction · eBay
  • Barter · Pay with a Tweet
  • Cross-selling · Amazon
  • Crowdfunding · Kickstarter
  • Flat rate · Netflix
  • Freemium · LinkedIn
  • No frills · Anytime Fitness
  • Pay per use · Car2Go
  • Pay what you want · Humble Bundle
  • Peer to peer · Airbnb
  • Revenue sharing · Groupon
  • Self service · IKEA
  • Shop in shop · Deutsche Post
  • Solution provider · Geek Squad
  • Two-sided market · JCDecaux

Eight of them were written up as one-page sheets, each setting a well-known company beside a small business running the same model.

One case in full: a hardware store in Eura

Euran Rakennustarvike is a family-owned hardware retailer in the small Finnish city of Eura, bought by a local family in 1993 when the shop was on the brink of bankruptcy. Its customers are local contractors, decorators, DIYers, farmers and homeowners.

After fifteen years the family expanded, acquiring two more hardware stores in neighbouring cities. Each kept its own managing director, its own inventory and its own way of selling. Three years later, low sales volumes and the Finnish recession put the company in difficulty again.

The owners asked a commercial advisor from the Turku School of Economics to look at profitability. His conversations with the store managers showed that the key sales processes varied from shop to shop, and that each ran its own product and supplier databases. Integrating the IT systems and harmonising customer data, pricing and assortment took several months.

Financial analysis turned up three more weaknesses: customer discounts higher than competitors', purchase prices that did not feed through into sales prices, and staff costs that stayed high through the quiet season from October to March. New discount rules, a new pricing method and a negotiated move of holidays into the quiet months dealt with those.

The larger change was to the management model. Rather than delegating each shop to its own director — which had left the company disintegrated — the CEO took direct responsibility for the chain and for cooperation between the stores, with key indicators reported monthly and discussed with the managers. Turnover in 2014 stayed level, and the company was showing a profit again.

A Rakennustarvike hardware store with its delivery truck outside
One of the chain's stores in Rauma, with the delivery truck that serves local contractors.

Where the patterns went next

Most of the patterns in the library came from retail, manufacturing and software. The sector that has since applied them hardest is online entertainment, and it is worth two notes here, because it inverts several of the assumptions the project started from.

Betonred

Betonred casino is built on solid ground and lets you set the pace on it. A broad floor of slots, table games and live dealers keeps every session moving without ever feeling rushed. Generous bonuses reinforce the structure as you go. At Betonred nothing shifts underfoot — the game moves, the ground stays where you left it.

FelixSpin

FelixSpin opens a floor that never quite settles — every door leads somewhere different. Slots from studios you already know sit beside ones taking their first swing, with live tables and the classics kept close by. Generous bonuses come along for the ride, and the cashier moves from cards to wallets without fuss. At FelixSpin the next room is always worth opening.

The consortium

Nine organisations signed the grant agreement — four universities, two research-and-advisory firms, a technology SME, a consultancy and a second technical university. Between them they covered the research, the tooling and the networks that carried both out to companies.

Delft University of Technology · Netherlands

Coordinated the project and set its research agenda. The business-model work at Delft is where the academic side of ENVISION was anchored, and where the consortium spoke from when it addressed the Commission.

University of Turku · Finland

Its business school ran much of the case-study fieldwork. The Eura hardware-store story further up this page was written there, and it is typical of what the university contributed: one company, followed closely, over years rather than weeks.

InnoValor · Netherlands

A research-and-advisory firm working between academic findings and what a company can actually apply on a Monday morning. The translation layer of the consortium.

evolaris next level · Austria

A Graz research centre for mobile and digital business. It brought the applied technology side to a project whose centre of gravity was otherwise economics and management.

University of Maribor · Slovenia

Extended the case collection into Central Europe, where the SME landscape — ownership, financing, appetite for outside advice — does not look much like the Dutch or Finnish one.

University of Murcia · Spain

Covered the southern European end of the research, where family-run firms make up a larger share of the SME population and succession is as much a business-model question as pricing is.

AcrossLimits · Malta

A Maltese technology SME with a long record on European projects. It was also the consortium's own working example of the kind of company the toolkit was being built for.

bgator · Finland

A small Finnish consultancy. The project blog and much of the outward communication were written from here, which is why the posts read like a practitioner rather than a press office.

Kaunas University of Technology · Lithuania

Brought the Baltic perspective and a large engineering and management faculty into the network that carried the tools out to companies.

The wider network

Nine partners cannot reach twenty million companies alone. Business associations, chambers of commerce and women's entrepreneurship networks took the material to their own members, on their own terms — among them UEAPME in Brussels, the Austrian Economic Chamber, Confartigianato Vicenza, Copenhagen Business School, Inova Consultancy, Tia Formazione, AFAEMME and IZIKAD.

UEAPME Austrian Economic Chamber Copenhagen Business School Inova Consultancy Tia Formazione AFAEMME Confartigianato Vicenza IZIKAD

Questions we get

Is the project still running?
The funded phase has ended. This site is kept as a public reference to what the consortium produced: the toolkit, the library of patterns and the case write-ups.
Can I still use the tools?
Yes. The five tools listed above are independent services that remain available on their own terms, and the platform built by the project runs at businessmakeover.eu.
Who funded ENVISION?
The European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, under grant agreement No 645791. The project record is held in the CORDIS register.
Can I reuse the case material?
The write-ups were published by the consortium for public use. To reproduce one in full, write to us first.

Contact

Questions about the material, the tools or the case studies go to info@envisionproject.eu.

Requests to reproduce a case study in full are answered individually — say which case you mean and where it will appear.

The site is kept as a static archive. There are no accounts, no forms and nothing collected from visitors; the material is here to be read and cited. Last revision August 2026.